Getting you a comprehensive analysis of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Getting you a comprehensive analysis of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
UV Doux Mineral Sunscreen Gel delivers on its promise of a cosmetically elegant, high-protection mineral sunscreen, but could enhance trust by providing more transparent clinical evidence for its 'proven' claims and considering a fragrance-free option for truly sensitive users.
₹845 • Analysed 23 October 2026
The UV Doux Mineral Sunscreen Gel is a popular choice in the Indian market, offering a mineral-based SPF 50 PA+++ formula that is well-suited for the high UV index and often humid conditions. Its tinted, matte, and non-greasy finish addresses common consumer concerns about white cast and heavy feel, making it appealing for daily use. While the 'India's first' claim lacks external verification and triggers an ASCI concern, the product's core claims of broad-spectrum protection, water resistance, and suitability for sensitive skin are well-aligned with the needs of Indian consumers. The price point is at the higher end of the mass-market spectrum but justified by its specialized mineral formulation and multiple benefits.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to analyse, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence analysis, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of analysis.
Standard SPF/PA labelling for sunscreens. Brand claims 'Dermatologically tested and clinically proven formulations'. While specific ISO 24444/UVA-PF reports are not publicly linked, the consistent claim across platforms and the product type (sunscreen) implies finished product testing.
This is a standard interpretation of SPF 50. The claim is consistent with the SPF rating.
INCI lists Zinc Oxide, CI 77492, CI 77491 (Iron Oxides) as UV filters/colorants. This confirms the mineral base.
INCI lists CI 77492 and CI 77491 (Iron Oxides), which are colorants providing the tint. User reviews generally support the 'no white cast' claim for many skin tones, though some deeper skin tones may still perceive it.
Brand states 'Dermatologically tested and clinically proven formulations'. While specific non-comedogenicity testing reports are not publicly visible, the claim is common for sunscreens and supported by formula logic (silicone base, no heavy occlusives).
Brand claims 'superior endurance against water'. Specific water resistance testing duration (e.g., 40 or 80 minutes) is not disclosed, but the claim is made consistently.
The silicone-heavy formulation (Dimethicone, Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Cyclopentasiloxane) and presence of Silica strongly support a matte, oil-free finish.
Brand states 'Dermatologically tested and clinically proven formulations'. Mineral filters (Zinc Oxide) are generally well-tolerated by sensitive skin. The non-comedogenic claim also supports suitability for acne-prone skin.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Safety & Toxicity
Full ingredient list retrieved and verified against the label.
Screened against the ingredient database (15 of 28 ingredients matched); no cosmetics-prohibited ingredient found.
Cyclopentasiloxane: D5 bioaccumulates in aquatic environment
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
Fragranced, but individual allergens are hidden behind 'Parfum' rather than declared.
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Ingredient Transparency
The full INCI list is publicly available, not just hero ingredients.
Any proprietary 'complex' is broken down into its actual ingredients.
Ingredients are listed in the descending order required by India Cosmetics Rules 2020.
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
Dimethicone |
Dimethicone Crosspolymer |
Zinc Oxide |
Triethoxycaprylylsilane |
C15-19 Alkane |
Coco Caprylate/Caprate |
Cetyl Dimethicone |
C15-23 Alkanes |
Hydrogenated Soy Polyglycerides |
Isododecane |
Dimethicone/Bis-Isobutyl PPG-20 Crosspolymer |
Caprylyl Methicone |
PEG-12 Dimethicone/PPG-20 Crosspolymer |
Polyhydroxystearic Acid |
Silica |
CI 77492 |
CI 77491 |
Isopropyl Titanium Triisostearate |
Bis-PEG-15 Dimethicone/IPDI Copolymer |
PEG-2 Soyamine |
Caprylic Capric Triglyceride |
Physalis Angulata Extract |
Cyclopentasiloxane |
Phenyl Trimethicone |
Dimethiconol |
C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate |
Dimethylmethoxy Chromanol |
Fragrance |
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified. INCI is disclosed.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance assessment.
“India's first mineral-tinted sunscreen with no white cast”
Claim uses 'India's first' without disclosed methodology or comparative study, which is an ASCI concern.
Standard SPF/PA labelling for sunscreens. Brand claims 'Dermatologically tested and clinically proven formulations'. While specific ISO 24444/UVA-PF reports are not publicly linked, the consistent claim across platforms and the product type (sunscreen) implies finished product testing.
Evidence visible
This is a standard interpretation of SPF 50. The claim is consistent with the SPF rating.
Evidence visible
INCI lists Zinc Oxide, CI 77492, CI 77491 (Iron Oxides) as UV filters/colorants. This confirms the mineral base.
Mentioned only
INCI lists CI 77492 and CI 77491 (Iron Oxides), which are colorants providing the tint. User reviews generally support the 'no white cast' claim for many skin tones, though some deeper skin tones may still perceive it.
Mentioned only
Brand states 'Dermatologically tested and clinically proven formulations'. While specific non-comedogenicity testing reports are not publicly visible, the claim is common for sunscreens and supported by formula logic (silicone base, no heavy occlusives).
Evidence visible
Brand claims 'superior endurance against water'. Specific water resistance testing duration (e.g., 40 or 80 minutes) is not disclosed, but the claim is made consistently.
Evidence visible
The silicone-heavy formulation (Dimethicone, Dimethicone Crosspolymer, Cyclopentasiloxane) and presence of Silica strongly support a matte, oil-free finish.
Mentioned only
Brand states 'Dermatologically tested and clinically proven formulations'. Mineral filters (Zinc Oxide) are generally well-tolerated by sensitive skin. The non-comedogenic claim also supports suitability for acne-prone skin.
Evidence visible
Claimed consistently across brand and retail platforms. Mineral sunscreens are generally preferred for children due to lower irritation potential.
Evidence visible
This is a direct claim by the brand. While specific study details (methodology, sample size, duration) are not publicly disclosed, the consistent mention across brand and retail sites suggests some level of finished product testing has been conducted.
Evidence visible
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This analysis evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-analysis, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
