Getting you a comprehensive analysis of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Getting you a comprehensive analysis of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →While the Moiser FM Face Moisturizing Gel offers a promising blend of hydrating and barrier-repairing ingredients, consumers must be highly cautious of exaggerated and unsubstantiated SPF claims found on certain online platforms, as the product does not appear to offer sun protection.
₹435 • Analysed 22 October 2026
Moiser FM Face Moisturizing Gel is positioned as a lightweight, hydrating solution well-suited for India's often humid and warm climate, catering to 'all skin types' including oily and sensitive skin. Its price point, ranging from Rs.435-750 for 50ml, places it in the mid-to-premium segment for moisturizers in the Indian market. While the brand makes responsible claims on its official channels, some marketplace listings feature highly problematic claims like 'high SPF protection aded' and 'Not reqvire a sunscreen', which are significant ASCI concerns and could mislead consumers about sun protection in India's high UV environment. The product's disclaimer on Medcart Healthcare, stating it's a cosmetic and not intended to treat or cure disease, is a positive step towards CDSCO compliance.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to analyse, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence analysis, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of analysis.
Claimed by multiple sources, including 'Advanced hydration technology that keeps skin supple for up to 3 days'. However, no publicly visible clinical study details (sample size, methodology, duration, results) are provided to substantiate this specific time-bound claim on the finished product.
The product is described as a gel, and the ingredient list (containing water, humectants, and gelling agents) supports a lightweight texture. This is a routine cosmetic claim supported by formula logic.
A common claim for gel formulations. While plausible given the formula, no specific absorption tests are publicly visible. User experience is subjective.
Supported by the gel texture and the absence of heavy occlusives high in the inferred ingredient list. However, no specific non-greasiness tests are publicly visible.
Claimed by multiple sources. No publicly visible testing (e.g., rabbit ear assay or human clinical study) to support this claim on the finished product.
Claimed by multiple sources. While the claim states 'Dermatologically Tested', no details of the testing (e.g., type of test, results, independent lab name) are publicly visible. This is a Level 4 claim as testing is stated to be done, but without details, it's high risk for a clinical claim.
Supported by the presence of Ceramide Complex (Ceramide NP, AP, EOP, Phytosphingosine, Cholesterol), Niacinamide, and Phytosqualane in the inferred ingredient list. These ingredients are well-researched for their role in barrier function. This is ingredient-level evidence.
Supported by the presence of Sodium Hyaluronate, Glycerin, Pentylene Glycol, Sodium PCA, Sodium Lactate, Trehalose, Glucose, Fructose, Maltose, and Allantoin in the inferred ingredient list. These are well-known humectants.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Safety & Toxicity
Full ingredient list retrieved and verified against the label.
Brand describes ingredient origin in its claims.
Screened against the ingredient database (21 of 30 ingredients matched); no cosmetics-prohibited ingredient found.
No ingredient with a recognised endocrine-activity concern found in the database.
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
Contains ingredient(s) commonly rated comedogenic: isopropyl myristate. May not suit very acne-prone skin.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
No EU-declarable or database-flagged allergen found in the list.
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Ingredient Transparency
The full INCI list is publicly available, not just hero ingredients.
Any proprietary 'complex' is broken down into its actual ingredients.
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
No retinoid or other pregnancy-cautioned active found in the screen.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
AQSA/DM WATER/EAU |
ISOPROPYL MYRISTATE |
PENTYLENE GLYCOL |
GLYCERIN |
FRUCTOSE |
CITRIC ACID |
NIACINAMIDE |
SODIUM HYALURONATE |
PANTHENOL |
CERAMIDE NP |
CERAMIDE AP |
CERAMIDE EOP |
PHYTOSPHINGOSINE |
CHOLESTEROL |
PHYTOSQUALANE |
SODIUM PCA |
SODIUM LACTATE |
TREHALOSE |
GLUCOSE |
MALTOSE |
ALLANTOIN |
ORYZA SATIVA (RICE) BRAN/GERM EXTRACT |
CENTELLA ASIATICA LEAF EXTRACT |
CHAMOMILLA RECUTITA (CHAMOMILE) FLOWER EXTRACT |
POLYACRYLATE-13 |
POLYISOBUTENE |
POLYSORBATE 20 |
SODIUM LAUROYL LACTYLATE |
CARBOMER |
XANTHAN GUM |
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance assessment.
“72 Hour Hydration”
Quantified time-bound claim ('72 Hour') without publicly disclosed, verifiable clinical study details (sample size, method, population, results) to support it, which may be considered an absolute claim requiring robust evidence under ASCI Chapter 1.4.
“UV Protection: Yes”
Absolute claim ('Yes') of UV protection without any disclosed UV filters in the INCI or verifiable SPF/PA testing. This is a significant claim that requires robust clinical evidence under ASCI Chapter 1.4 and 4.1.
“Not reqvire a sunscreen becouse a high SPF protection aded”
This is an absolute and highly misleading claim that directly advises against sunscreen use based on an unproven 'high SPF protection'. This is a severe violation of ASCI Chapter 1.4 (Truthful and Honest) and 4.1 (Personal Care & Health) as it can endanger consumer health by promoting inadequate sun protection.
“high spf aded natural skin lightening moisturizer”
The 'high spf' component of this claim is unsubstantiated and misleading, triggering ASCI concern under Chapter 1.4 and 4.1. 'Skin lightening' is also an ambitious claim without clinical proof.
Claimed by multiple sources, including 'Advanced hydration technology that keeps skin supple for up to 3 days'. However, no publicly visible clinical study details (sample size, methodology, duration, results) are provided to substantiate this specific time-bound claim on the finished product.
Missing
The product is described as a gel, and the ingredient list (containing water, humectants, and gelling agents) supports a lightweight texture. This is a routine cosmetic claim supported by formula logic.
Mentioned only
A common claim for gel formulations. While plausible given the formula, no specific absorption tests are publicly visible. User experience is subjective.
Mentioned only
Supported by the gel texture and the absence of heavy occlusives high in the inferred ingredient list. However, no specific non-greasiness tests are publicly visible.
Mentioned only
Claimed by multiple sources. No publicly visible testing (e.g., rabbit ear assay or human clinical study) to support this claim on the finished product.
Missing
Claimed by multiple sources. While the claim states 'Dermatologically Tested', no details of the testing (e.g., type of test, results, independent lab name) are publicly visible. This is a Level 4 claim as testing is stated to be done, but without details, it's high risk for a clinical claim.
Evidence visible
Supported by the presence of Ceramide Complex (Ceramide NP, AP, EOP, Phytosphingosine, Cholesterol), Niacinamide, and Phytosqualane in the inferred ingredient list. These ingredients are well-researched for their role in barrier function. This is ingredient-level evidence.
Mentioned only
Supported by the presence of Sodium Hyaluronate, Glycerin, Pentylene Glycol, Sodium PCA, Sodium Lactate, Trehalose, Glucose, Fructose, Maltose, and Allantoin in the inferred ingredient list. These are well-known humectants.
Mentioned only
Supported by the presence of Niacinamide, known for its multiple skin benefits including improving skin tone and texture. This is ingredient-level evidence.
Mentioned only
Supported by the presence of Panthenol (Pro-Vitamin B5) and other humectants/emollients in the inferred ingredient list. This is ingredient-level evidence.
Mentioned only
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This analysis evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-analysis, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.