Getting you a comprehensive analysis of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Getting you a comprehensive analysis of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
While formulated for mild conditioning, this shampoo's marketing on some platforms makes ambitious, unsubstantiated, and potentially unlawful claims that outrun its visible evidence and core purpose.
₹142 • Analysed 22 October 2026
This Lucaina shampoo is positioned as a mild, conditioning, and daily-use product, which generally suits the Indian climate, especially for those seeking gentle cleansing without stripping natural oils. The price point is competitive within the mass-market segment. However, the 'Medicated' claim on IndiaMART is a significant regulatory concern, as it implies drug-like action without visible CDSCO drug registration, potentially misleading consumers. Additionally, broad claims like 'Anti-hair Fall' and 'Anti-dandruff' without specific clinical evidence may attract ASCI scrutiny.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to analyse, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence analysis, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of analysis.
This is a core product descriptor and functional claim. No specific test data found, but aligns with product type.
Claimed as 'Dermatologist-tested' on Flipkart, which provides some finished-product testing evidence.
Claim made by retailers. Full INCI not available to independently verify the absence of all soap/alkali compounds, but the claim is explicit.
Functional claim, likely supported by mild surfactant system. No specific finished product evidence found.
Supported by 'Dermatologist-tested' claim.
Supported by the presence of conditioning agents like Silicone Quaternium-22.2 and D-Panthenol. No finished product test for this specific outcome found.
Claim made by retailers. Full INCI not available to independently verify absence.
Claim states professional testing was done. No detailed study report (sample size, method, results) is publicly visible, but the claim of testing itself is noted.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Safety & Toxicity
Full ingredient list retrieved and verified against the label.
Brand describes ingredient origin in its claims.
Screened against the ingredient database (0 of 3 ingredients matched); no cosmetics-prohibited ingredient found.
No ingredient with a recognised endocrine-activity concern found in the database.
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
No EU-declarable or database-flagged allergen found in the list.
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Uses milder (non-sulphate) surfactants.
Ingredient Transparency
Active percentages are disclosed for the hero ingredient(s).
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
Silicone Quaternum- 22.2 |
Aloe Vera |
D Panthenol |
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on partial disclosure.
Full INCI not disclosed, which is a transparency gap under India Cosmetics Rules 2020. The 'Medicated' claim without drug license is a significant concern.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on partial disclosure.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on partial disclosure.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on partial disclosure.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on partial disclosure.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on partial disclosure.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on partial disclosure.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on partial disclosure.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on partial disclosure.
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance assessment.
“Medicated”
Claim 'Medicated' for a shampoo without visible CDSCO drug license crosses the drug-cosmetic boundary under India's Drugs & Cosmetics Act 1940.
“Applied For: Deep Conditioning, Daily Care, Nourishment & Moisturization, Straightening & Smoothening,…”
Broad, unhedged claims like 'Anti-hair Fall', 'Anti-dandruff', 'Restore & Renew' without specific clinical evidence for this product are likely to be considered unsubstantiated by ASCI.
This is a core product descriptor and functional claim. No specific test data found, but aligns with product type.
Missing
Claimed as 'Dermatologist-tested' on Flipkart, which provides some finished-product testing evidence.
Evidence visible
Claim made by retailers. Full INCI not available to independently verify the absence of all soap/alkali compounds, but the claim is explicit.
Missing
Functional claim, likely supported by mild surfactant system. No specific finished product evidence found.
Missing
Supported by 'Dermatologist-tested' claim.
Evidence visible
Supported by the presence of conditioning agents like Silicone Quaternium-22.2 and D-Panthenol. No finished product test for this specific outcome found.
Mentioned only
Claim made by retailers. Full INCI not available to independently verify absence.
Missing
Claim states professional testing was done. No detailed study report (sample size, method, results) is publicly visible, but the claim of testing itself is noted.
Evidence visible
Claim made by retailer. Full INCI not available to independently verify absence.
Missing
This claim is made on IndiaMART. 'Medicated' implies drug-like properties and requires specific drug licensing in India. No such license or evidence is publicly visible.
Missing
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This analysis evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-analysis, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
