Getting you a comprehensive analysis of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Getting you a comprehensive analysis of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
This mineral sunscreen makes strong claims of broad-spectrum protection and suitability for sensitive skin, but its lack of public ingredient transparency and ambitious 'no white cast' claim for a mineral formula warrant caution.
₹449 • Analysed 22 October 2026
This Be Bodywise mineral sunscreen offers SPF 50+ PA++++, which is highly relevant for India's high UV index. The 'no white cast' claim is particularly important for Indian skin tones, as mineral sunscreens often leave a visible residue. The product's pricing strategy shows significant variation, with a premium MRP but frequent deep discounts on the brand's own site and Nykaa, making it more accessible. Without a publicly available INCI list, verifying 'chemical-free' and other ingredient-dependent claims, as required by India Cosmetics Rules 2020, is not possible, which impacts consumer trust.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to analyse, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence analysis, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of analysis.
SPF 50+ is a standard claim for sunscreens, implying in-vivo testing. Be Bodywise generally states its sunscreens are 'clinically-tested SPF 50'.
PA++++ is a standard claim for sunscreens, implying in-vivo testing for UVA protection. Be Bodywise generally states its sunscreens are 'clinically-tested SPF 50'.
The brand explicitly states these mineral filters are used. This is an ingredient-level claim, not requiring finished product testing for the '100% mineral' aspect itself.
Implied by SPF 50+ PA++++ rating, which requires testing for both UVA and UVB protection. Be Bodywise generally states its sunscreens are 'clinically-tested SPF 50'.
Claimed by the brand. Without a full INCI, we cannot verify the 'chemical-free' aspect beyond the stated absence of chemical UV filters. 'Gentle' is a subjective claim.
Subjective sensory claims. No specific finished product test results for 'ultra-light' or 'non-greasy' were found for this specific mineral sunscreen.
These are ambitious claims for a mineral sunscreen, which are notoriously difficult to formulate without a white cast. No finished product evidence (e.g., instrumental data or consumer perception study) is publicly visible to support these claims for this specific product.
Claims a specific technology 'Pollufence™' for defense. This is an ingredient-level claim. No finished product evidence for this specific sunscreen's anti-pollution efficacy is publicly visible.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
Cannot assess due to lack of full INCI list.
Cannot assess due to lack of full INCI list. INCI disclosure is mandatory on label.
Cannot assess due to lack of full INCI list.
Cannot assess due to lack of full INCI list.
Cannot assess due to lack of full INCI list.
Cannot assess due to lack of full INCI list.
Cannot assess due to lack of full INCI list.
Cannot assess due to lack of full INCI list.
Cannot assess due to lack of full INCI list.
Cannot assess due to lack of full INCI list.
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance assessment.
SPF 50+ is a standard claim for sunscreens, implying in-vivo testing. Be Bodywise generally states its sunscreens are 'clinically-tested SPF 50'.
Evidence visible
PA++++ is a standard claim for sunscreens, implying in-vivo testing for UVA protection. Be Bodywise generally states its sunscreens are 'clinically-tested SPF 50'.
Evidence visible
The brand explicitly states these mineral filters are used. This is an ingredient-level claim, not requiring finished product testing for the '100% mineral' aspect itself.
Mentioned only
Implied by SPF 50+ PA++++ rating, which requires testing for both UVA and UVB protection. Be Bodywise generally states its sunscreens are 'clinically-tested SPF 50'.
Evidence visible
Claimed by the brand. Without a full INCI, we cannot verify the 'chemical-free' aspect beyond the stated absence of chemical UV filters. 'Gentle' is a subjective claim.
Missing
Subjective sensory claims. No specific finished product test results for 'ultra-light' or 'non-greasy' were found for this specific mineral sunscreen.
Missing
These are ambitious claims for a mineral sunscreen, which are notoriously difficult to formulate without a white cast. No finished product evidence (e.g., instrumental data or consumer perception study) is publicly visible to support these claims for this specific product.
Missing
Claims a specific technology 'Pollufence™' for defense. This is an ingredient-level claim. No finished product evidence for this specific sunscreen's anti-pollution efficacy is publicly visible.
Mentioned only
'Fragrance-free' cannot be verified without INCI. 'Non-comedogenic' and 'dermatologist-tested' are clinical claims. Be Bodywise generally states its sunscreens are 'clinically-tested'.
Evidence visible
While mineral sunscreens are generally recommended for sensitive skin, this is a strong suitability claim. No specific finished product testing for 'perfect for' sensitive/acne-prone skin is publicly visible.
Missing
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This analysis evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-analysis, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
